Today we have been analysing how we did in a recent piece of written classwork entitled ¿Qué hiciste?. Here are two examples. What level would you mark them at? If the mark is shown, do you agree? Why/Why not?
WoK MFL Student Work
Labels
Achievement
(3)
animation
(1)
Art
(2)
Avatars
(1)
Awards
(1)
BA Flag Award
(2)
Blogs
(1)
Celebrities
(1)
Classwork
(17)
Communication
(1)
Competition
(4)
Coverwork
(3)
Culture
(1)
e-Safety
(4)
European Week of Languages
(6)
Exchanges
(13)
Food
(1)
French
(33)
German
(6)
Grammar
(7)
Homework
(10)
ICT
(3)
Induction
(3)
Intercultural Understanding
(18)
Internationalism
(17)
Japanese
(3)
Language Leaders
(1)
Language Learning
(3)
Languages Laboratory
(1)
Languages News
(9)
Memory techniques
(2)
Modal Verbs
(2)
MYLO
(2)
Peer Assessment
(5)
Podcast
(3)
Possessive Adjectives.
(1)
Resources
(6)
Snow
(4)
Songs
(2)
Spanish
(8)
Speaking
(6)
Student blogging
(3)
Student Lead
(4)
Student Voice
(7)
Technology
(18)
Transition
(1)
Videoconferences
(8)
Vokis
(1)
Why Learn Languages
(10)
Wikis
(1)
Word of the Day
(7)
MFL Hall of Fame
MFL Blog Roll
See below for examples of students' work, reviews of exchange trips and general MFL announcements:...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I believe for the second picture ('Charlottes Work') that it be graded a level 5a because, although it has three tense, but there are quite a lot of mistake about spelling and verb endings. Compared to the one above which has two mistakes but 2 tenses which i believe is fair as basically both pieces of work are the same standard.
ReplyDeleteLivi
I believe that the second piece of work ('Charlottes Work') should be graded a level 5a because, although there are three tenses, there are quite a lot of mistake surrounding spelling and verb endings. Compared to the other piece of work which only has two tense but only has one or two mistake (It also level 5a). So i believe that the two writers are writing at similar levels.
ReplyDeleteLivi
I think that Jordanna's work was worth a 6c because it had hardly any mistakes and it used lots of examples of the Preterite tense. However Charlotte's work was, as I think the same standard which I agree was a level 6c aswell.
ReplyDeleteEmma
I think that the second one is better as it does have 3 tenses, and the first one only has two. The first might be more accurate but only just.
ReplyDeleteI think that Charlotte should be graded a level 6c because she has 3 tenses however only just because she only has a little bit in the present tense but she has lots of different preterite tense verbs and in different forms to so that should get her a high mark. She also has lots of good time phrases-just dont get mixed up with french!
ReplyDeleteI think Jordanna should be given a 5a because she has lots of examples of the preterite tense however i dont think it deserves a 6c beacause she only has 2 tenses and one, the present, only has a couple of sentences. In my opinion it would be a 5b but she doesnt have many mistakes so if i could i would give it a 5b and 1/2!!
Jenny
I think they should get the same level as the second one had more tenses but the first one was more accurate.
ReplyDeleteI think that charlotte's work should stay as a 6c because she used three tenses and added lots of examples of que hiciste and many adjectives aswell.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the marks. This is because they both have plenty of examples of the tenses but one has just a few more examples.I think that Jordanna could have achieved a level 6c if she had just made her paragraph a bit longer but other than that both the paragraphs were very good.
ReplyDelete